|
|
|
||
|
|
Mosaic comes from the Greek word mouseios which means of the muses, artistic. |
||
|
|
When somebody talks about trisomy, or partial trisomy they mean that as far as anyone can tell the chromosomal anomaly occurs in every cell of the body. With mosaicism there is a chromosomal anomaly, but not in every cell. Some cells have the "normal" complement and arrangement of chromosomes and some cells have the chromosomal anomaly. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
So for example in the case of Trisomy 18 there are three complete 18th chromosomes. With Trisomy 18 mosaic some cells have the three complete 18th chromosomes, but some cells have the normal complement of two complete 18th chromosomes. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Mosaicism can happen with any chromosomal anomaly, not just "full" trisomy. For example, with Trisomy 18q all the cells have the additional q arm of the 18th chromosome. With Trisomy 18q mosaic, some cells have the additional q arm, and some have the "normal" complement of two complete 18 chromosomes. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The effect of mosaicism is wide and variable. Effected individuals can have all of the problems associated with the "full" variant of the chromosomal anomaly or none and anywhere in between. Some people also feel that if an individual has a mosaic chromosomal anomaly that they do not have the physical problems and or cognitive problems of those who have a "full" version of the chromosomal anomaly. Sadly this is not the case. Children with a mosaic diagnosis have just as much risk of early death as those with a "full" diagnosis. It is not the chromosomal anomaly itself which causes the early death of our children but how the changes in the genetic material effects the developing baby. Children with a mosaic diagnosis are just as likely to have life threatening cardiac problems, apneas, feeding problems and other potentially life threatening or life shortening congenital problems. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The difference between mosaic and "full" generally does not become apparent until after infancy. Children with a mosaic diagnosis tend to do better developmentally, but that is by no means a universal statement. Milestones are often still delayed, and the child generally must work harder than the average child to achieve those milestones others take for granted. While some children with a mosaic diagnosis will "walk and talk", some do not. Some will learn to eat orally, some will not. And there is absolutely no way, at this point in time, of predicting which children will be effected and how. In some ways a mosaic diagnosis is very unpredictable and challenging for both the parents and the effected person. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Many people place a lot of credence in the percentage of cells that contain the chromosomal anomaly. So for example they think that if a person has 85% of the cells with the additional chromosomal anomaly that they will be "more" effected than a person who has say 10% of their cells with the chromosomal anomaly. Unfortunately the true effect of mosaicism depends not only on how many cells are effected (percentage), but where those cells are (distribution). |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When doctors test for chromosomal anomalies, they generally take a sample of cells using a minimally invasive method. Most often, after birth this is via blood, or more correctly they look at "peripheral lymphocytes". While blood is a good sample to test it does not reveal what is happening in other body systems, eg skin, brain, heart, kidneys etc. Depending on when during embryonic development the mosaicism occurred, different body systems may have vastly different percentages of the chromosomal anomaly. Some may not have any evidence of cells with the chromosomal anomaly at all. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To test every organ and body system would be unethical and very invasive. However no-one can tell, without doing biopsies of every organ system, just what an individuals distribution of cells with a chromosomal anomaly is. As a result it is almost impossible to predict how an individual will be effected. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
So if "more effected" means cognitive ability, then someone who has 85% of their peripheral lymphocyte cells with the chromosomal anomaly may actually be "less" effected than someone who has 10% if the effected cells do not happen to lie within the brain. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To understand this more fully, you will first need to understand how it is thought that mosaicism occurs. I say "thought" because in actuality we really don't fully understand mosaicism. One of the primary problems has been that mosaicism is much "rarer" than the "full" chromosomal anomaly. For example estimates are that trisomy 18 mosaic occurs in between 1% and 10% of all cases of "full" trisomy 18. Mosaicism of partial trisomies is of course rarer still. As a result the "numbers" are not there for studies to be done and reports in the medical literature tend to be skewed towards the more "unusual" cases of mosaicism. For example in Trisomy 18 mosaic the cases reported in the medical literature tend to be single case studies of individuals with high percentages of trisomic cells but with high cognitive functioning and few physical anomalies. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
How does mosaicism occur? |
||
|
|
Theory 1. The most popular theory regarding mosaicism is that the egg and the sperm contained the "normal" complement of chromosomes. So unlike "full" trisomy meiosis was "normal". However sometime after the first meiotic division, that is after the ovum was fertilised by the sperm and the blastocyst began dividing an error occurred in the division of the cells. It is thought that when the chromosomes divided and migrated to the poles, or ends of the cell, that the division of the chromosomes was uneven and one end of the cell ended up with an additional chromosome and the other minus a chromosome. Because a complete monosomy, that is a cell minus a complete chromosome is incompatible with life those cells "died" off and were discarded by the body. The person is not actually "missing" cells however as the body compensates and "reprograms" to make up the numbers. As a result you now have three cell lines. Those cells which started out with the "normal" complement of chromosomes continue to divide and make more cells that are "normal". This is referred to as cell line one. Cell line two, are those cells which now have the chromosomal anomaly and they continue to divide, but divide and continue to make the same "mistake", because they copy the chromosomal arrangement that is already there, and have the additional chromosome. The third cell line, is that which has the missing chromosome. As I mentioned this cell line is discarded by the body very early on and so is rarely if ever mentioned. The distribution of the cells with the chromosomal anomaly depends on when exactly the original error occurred. If it occurred before the second week after conception, which is approximately when the fertilised egg begins to differentiate into body systems then the distribution is likely to be more "even" across the all the body systems. If it occurs after this then the distribution is more likely to be "uneven" with some body systems having a higher percentage of cells with the chromosomal anomaly than others. In fact some body systems may have no sign of the chromosomal anomaly. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Theory 2. "Cell Rescue" There is a second feasible, but less popular theory about how mosaicism occurs. It is sometimes referred to as "cell rescue". With this theory it is thought that the baby started out as having every cell effected by the chromosomal anomaly, eg trisomy. However because the body is always trying to "correct" any errors at some stage this actually happened and the additional chromosome was discarded. Division of cells after the chromosome anomaly was corrected, proceeded to replicate as cells with a "normal" chromosome arrangement. However some cells were unable to "correct" the error and continue to divide with the chromosomal anomaly. Again distribution of the effected cells is variable, depending on when and where the correction happened. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Testing for Mosaicism. |
||
|
|
Mosaicism is usually detected when testing for a suspected chromosomal anomaly is done. When a chromosomal analysis is done, the laboratory usually looks at a number of cells. When some of the cells looked at show a chromosomal anomaly and some do not mosaicism is suspected. To confirm the laboratory may repeat the study and or look at more cells than they would have with routine testing. The percentage is then calculated based on the number of cells with a chromosomal anomaly and those without. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
How many cells? |
||
|
|
I have mentioned previously that some doctors believe all surviving children with a trisomy are in fact mosaic. Many ask how they can say that when there are no "normal" cells seen in the chromosome analysis? |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When a chromosome analysis is done anywhere between 5 and 100 cells are usually looked at. This is only a small number of the many billions of cells in our body, and the cells examined are simply a random sample of cells that happened to be there at that particular time. Obviously the more cells that are looked at, the greater the level of accuracy. And similarly the more body systems looked at the greater the chances of detecting any mosaicism that may be present. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
So for example if 5 cells are examined and one cell shows the chromosome anomaly then the percentage would be 20%. It would then be expected that if 100 cells were looked at that there would be 20 cells showing the chromosomal anomaly. However if 100 cells were looked at only 2 cells showed the anomaly the percentage would be 2% and it is very possible that if a smaller number of cells were looked at that it would not have been seen. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Most often routine karyotyping is the test initially performed. This is costly and labour intensive. It involves culturing the cells until they reach a certain stage of cell division, they are then stained and looked at manually to determine the arrangement. This takes time and the results of this type of chromosomal analysis may take up to 2 weeks, sometimes more if the test needs to be repeated or checked at any stage. Depending on the laboratory protocol anywhere between 5 and 100 cells are looked at, but most often it is a smaller number around 20 unless mosaicism is suspected because it is more cost effective. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Recently a newer type of chromosomal testing has become more widely used, especially in the determination of mosaicism. It is called a FISH test (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation). The benefits of a FISH test are that it is possible to look at much larger numbers of cells at one time, for example 500 cells as opposed to 20 and the results are available very quickly as culturing is not necessary. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The major problem with FISH testing is that the test is very specific and the doctor must suspect ahead of time what chromosome anomaly they are looking for. For example if a FISH test is done specifically for Trisomy 18, it will not detect Trisomy 9. However a FISH test can actually be used to detect the exact area of a break point more reliably than a regular karyotype. It all depends on the exact probe used. Similarly a FISH test may show three signals for the 18th chromosome but it does not tell the technician if that signal comes from a whole extra chromosome or part of an extra chromosome. For this reason all results from a FISH test are considered preliminary until a cultured karyotype is performed to confirm the results. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
As FISH testing becomes more widely used and laboratories develop better probes the more accurate the results will be. For example a single FISH test has been developed for the rapid detection of the most common trisomies, trisomy 13, trisomy 18, trisomy 21 and triple X syndrome. While its is less specific than a test for trisomy 18 alone it will still not detect a trisomy of other chromosomes eg trisomy 9. This can only be done at this stage using a probe specific for trisomy 9 or by a cultured karyotype. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Margins of Error |
||
|
|
All tests carry with them the possibility of error, whether it be a cultured karyotype or FISH testing. In general these margins of error are small and fall somewhere in the range of 0.01% of all tests performed. So the reliability of chromosome testing is actually quite high. There is no way that I can possibly cover all the possible sources of error here, and the incidence is really quite small. The most common question that I am asked is if a mistake was made when percentages of effected cells changes over time. In general the answer to this is no, it is simply an artifact of the random nature of the cells taken for chromosome analysis. It is possible that as a person grows "cell rescue" may occur (see above for the theory of cell rescue) but there is no strong evidence that this is in fact the case. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If you have any concerns about the reliability of the chromosome testing done, please discuss these with your geneticist or genetic counsellor. This information is simply provided as a guide. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Some causes of error may include:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A final personal comment. No matter what the test results reveal about chromosomal arrangements in an individual these results will not change anything about them. They will always be the same unique individual that we love. It is very easy to become lost in the scientific explanations and forget to see the person behind the test results. |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
What is a Trisomy Index |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Home | What is a Trisomy? | What is Trisomy 18? | What is Trisomy 13? || Alex's Story | Stories From Special Friends | In Memory of Special Friends | | Special Occasions | Awards | Shapiro's Syndrome | SOFT Australia | Trisomy Listerv | |
||
|
|
Visitors Since 19th November 2000 FastCounter by bCentral |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||