Peace of Iraq
It sounds sort of re-assuring that the UN Resolution 1441 to get on with the weapons inspections in Iraq, has finally been voted on, and it looks as if the USA's attempt at "pre-emptive" war has been thwarted. But since the Secretary of State has stressed that the USA has "reserved the right to act against Iraq if it violated Security Council Resolution 1441", then it doesn't that make it meanlingless? What will be Bush's idea of a violation? Yes I know, he says it has to be a material violation, but how will he interpret that? What happens if the Bush Administration disagrees with the UN Security Council on such a violation? The stupidity isn't over yet.
It sounds sort of re-assuring that the UN Resolution 1441 to get on with the weapons inspections in Iraq, has finally been voted on, and it looks as if the USA's attempt at "pre-emptive" war has been thwarted. But since the Secretary of State has stressed that the USA has "reserved the right to act against Iraq if it violated Security Council Resolution 1441", then it doesn't that make it meanlingless? What will be Bush's idea of a violation? Yes I know, he says it has to be a material violation, but how will he interpret that? What happens if the Bush Administration disagrees with the UN Security Council on such a violation? The stupidity isn't over yet.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home